logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2018.09.21 2018고정370
모욕
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who works as a scientific instructor at the Daejeon Seo-gu C Educational Institute, Seo-gu, and the victim D (37 tax) who is an instructor of the said Institute, and the direction for the operation of the said Institute, and caused the dispute and caused the dispute to be discussed against the parents of the said Institute. On October 15, 2017, the Defendant made it possible for the president, instructors, and parents of the said Institute to view the Defendant’s message in the status of the Defendant’s Kakakao Stockholm Account.

A notice stating “The victim was openly insulting,” and thereby insulting the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the screen screen of a Kakao Stockholm;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense and Article 311 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act include a defense that the Defendant was unable to obtain, denies his/her responsibility, denying his/her responsibility, the appointment of a national defense counsel upon the Defendant’s wishes, etc., and the victim did not appear at the trial date after the trial. In light of the unfavorable circumstances, the Defendant’s primary offender who did not have the record of criminal punishment, etc., under consideration of the favorable circumstances, such as the Defendant’s environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the punishment is determined as per Disposition by comprehensively considering various sentencing factors indicated in the instant argument, such as the Defendant’s environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime.

arrow