1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the Defendants guaranteed the Plaintiff’s minimum living expenses. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the Defendant Company called for the Plaintiff as an instructor of the E Private Institutes (hereinafter “Defendant Private Institutes”) new door to the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff discontinued the existing University Course and worked to prepare for the establishment of the Defendant Private Institutes, and the Defendants did not comply with their commitments, and thus, the Defendants jointly and severally compensate the Plaintiff for damages. As such, the Defendants were jointly and severally liable to compensate the Plaintiff for the amount equivalent to the Plaintiff’s wages for the preparation of the Plaintiff’s establishment of the Defendant Private Institutes; the amount equivalent to the Plaintiff’s medical expenses incurred in the preparation for the establishment of the Defendant Private Institutes; the amount equivalent to the monthly minimum living expenses paid by the Defendants; the amount equivalent to the Defendant’s purchase of consumed goods for lectures at the Defendant Private Institutes; the amount equivalent to the Plaintiff’s tuition fees; the amount equivalent to the Plaintiff’s lecture fees; and the amount equivalent to the Plaintiff’s amount equivalent to the Plaintiff’s wages paid in advance; and the amount equivalent to the Plaintiff’s new amount equivalent to KRW 10.

2. The judgment was based on the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff, and the Defendants, in order to guarantee the Plaintiff’s minimum living cost, were to work as an instructor of the Defendant’s driving school, thereby deceiving the Plaintiff.

In light of the above, there is no evidence to acknowledge that the Defendants did not pay the Plaintiff the tuition fee, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this, the Plaintiff’s above assertion is without merit without further examining the scope of compensation for damages.

3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.