The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged lies in the Hacheon-si Hacheon-si Hacheon-si Haak.

The Defendants decided that the victim J, a member of the Icheon-gu Council, is trying to participate in the operation of the H church, and the Defendants were willing to deliver a written appeal to the pastor and the head of the supervision school located in the Macheon-gu.

Accordingly, on July 1, 2013, in common, at L restaurants located in Macheon-si, the Defendants: (a) collected, sweed, sweed, sweed, and sweed up, and sweed off, and do so, so far under the title of “Sweed up,” using computer documentation functions in the form A4; (b) the Defendants were under the command of Hacheon-si; (c) J pastors and sweed up to sweed off, do not direct. At this moment, I tried to see Mwed away and new Nwegs to the effect that I want to see, and (d) I tried to open the 4th session and open the sweed up to the 0th session by openly inserting the O, but the result of the case was revealed, and the result of this case was terminated by publicly inserting the victim’s name and the swed up to the 4th session by openly inserting it.”

2. The grounds for dismissing the prosecution of this case are the crimes falling under Article 307(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 312(2) of the Criminal Act. According to the written agreement bound in the trial records, the victimJ may recognize the fact that the Defendants have withdrawn their wish to punish all the Defendants around October 2, 2014, which is the date of the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.