logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2018.07.26 2018노109
무고
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. A summary of the grounds for appeal filed a false complaint with a certified judicial scrivener D and his employees stating that “A certified judicial scrivener filed a false statement with respect to the transfer of ownership, trust registration, application for issuance of a certified copy of resident registration, and application for certification of local tax, and the proxy documents were not forged,” although he recognized that the above proxy documents were not forged, he/she arbitrarily rejected the certificate of seal imprint and arbitrarily forged the delegation of trust registration, the delegation of resident registration, the abstract of resident registration, and the delegation of local tax, and thereby forged the delegation of ownership transfer and trust.”

Nevertheless, there was a perception that the defendant was false;

The judgment of the court below that acquitted the defendant on the ground that it is difficult to conclude it is erroneous and adversely affecting the judgment.

2. Determination

A. Around November 27, 2016, the summary of the facts charged was prepared by the Defendant at the Defendant’s office located in Sungsan-gu, Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si, in a false accusation against D.

The chief of the complaint is a certified judicial scrivener who registered the trust of the E Housing Reconstruction Association on behalf of the defendant D.

1. To prepare a false power of attorney and submit a letter of attorney for registration of trust in the complainant's name with his own seal and seal affixed thereon; and

2. By preparing and signing a power of attorney in a false manner, to forge and submit an abstract of resident registration in the complainant’s name;

3.A trust registration was made with the issuance of a false power of attorney, affixing a false seal, forging and submitting a power of attorney for proof of local tax, making the seal of the complainant at will, forging the above documents, thereby forging them.

The purport is “......”

However, in fact, since the defendant entrusted D with the transfer of ownership, trust registration, application for issuance of a copy of resident registration, and application for certification of local tax for the transfer of ownership, trust, issuance of a copy of resident registration, and the above proxy documents, the defendant forged the above proxy documents.

arrow