logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2015.07.20 2015고정662
폭행등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around 2014, the Defendant started to run the above restaurant operated by the victim C (V, 50 years old) in Nam-gu, Busan around 2014, and started to run the restaurant, and caused interference with the operation of the restaurant, and the above victim reported several times to the police, etc., was subject to fear of the above victim.

1. Around January 4, 2015, the Defendant respondeded to the following: (a) on January 4, 2015, the Defendant drinking alcohol in the above restaurant; (b) see the victim E (the age of 48) of the seat next to the restaurant; and (c) see, “A low-income person who runs away from the Republic of Korea. There is CCTV.” (d) the Defendant first responded to the foregoing victim’s wrong determination.”

Nevertheless, the Defendant abused the said victim by exercising the force against the said victim, such as taking a attitude that seems to be necessary for the said victim, by putting him/her away from her, and her away from his/her escape, and taking him/her away from her.

2. The Defendant: (a) heard the victim C, who was in compliance with the foregoing light view, who was harming the victim’s body, thereby threateninging the victim, such a victim as “I will not see any person.......”; (b) Merecker’s disease in the said victim’s item; and (c) “I will see ................ in the opening of the same year”; and (d) I would see the victim’s body, as it would inflict any harm on the victim’s body.”

3. The Defendant interfered with business by assault and threat as above, while obstructing the Defendant obstructed the restaurant business of the said victim by force, such as having the said victim concentrate on the business on the day by having the said victim concentrate on the business by going against the disturbance and going against the disturbance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by the defendant in this court;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to each statement made to E and C prepared by the police;

1. Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 260(1) of the same Act, the choice of a fine for a crime.

arrow