A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(b) there was no request for correction;

As above, the Defendant deceiving F and received 10 mobile phones equivalent to KRW 932,00 from F, the market price of the victim’s possession, which was opened in the name of G, via Kwikset Services, and received 10 mobile phones totaling KRW 9,207,00 from around that time to August 22, 2014, as shown in the separate crime list, from around 10 times.

2. The electronic records file, the electronic records file, and the fraud accused used the H’s name in order to enter a new mobile phone and dispose of it at will.

A. On August 21, 2014, the Defendant: (a) sent a phone to F at an insular location, and (b) entered K, an employee of the “J” mobile phone agency in F via F, into “H”, “L”, and “L”, and “B” in the column of the address of the aforementioned agency’s mobile phone subscription file; and (c) entered “H” in the column of the customer name on the said agency’s application file; and (d) the subscriber column.

As above, the Defendant created two copies of the electronic records of a new application for joining a mobile phone in the name of H, an electronic records of rights and obligations, for the purpose of making an excessive handling of affairs.

B. The Defendant: (a) at the time, at the time, at the time, at the place specified in paragraph (1) the electronic records event was held by K, who is aware of the fact that the electronic records were recorded, sent two copies of the computer files to be newly admitted to the mobile phone; and (b) KT Telephone Co., Ltd. sent two copies of the computer files to the entrance staff as if the electronic records were duly formed

(c)

The Defendant, at the time and place mentioned in paragraph (1), caused K to send two copies of the computer files to be newly admitted to a new mobile phone at the same time and place as above, to the victim KT Co., Ltd., the non-name-based telephone was sent to the officer in charge of entry.

As above, the defendant deceivings the employee in charge of false name.