logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2015.05.21 2015고정490
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around April 22, 2013, the Defendant driven a B Sti-type car under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.075% from the 1km section to the front road of the same Eup in the same Eup/Myeon-Umsan Busan Metropolitan City, Yangsan Metropolitan City.

2. The Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act, which was controlled by drinking driving at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), and was in advance demanded by the police officer C to present a driver’s license, and used the Defendant’s pro-friendly D resident registration number unlawfully.

3. The Defendant, at the time, at the time, at the time, and place specified in paragraph (1) of this Article, prepared a drinking control notice with respect to the above D using a portable information device (PDA), and demanded the Defendant to sign it. As such, the Defendant signed the above notification with D in any column for the driver’s name from among the above notification, and used the driver’s name column for the above D’s drinking control notice, which is a prior record of the certificate of facts, and had police officers know of the fact, transmit the above prior record to the police’s internal computer network as if it was duly formed.

4. The Defendant forged a private document, the date and time set forth in paragraph (1), and the place set forth in paragraph (1) and demanded the Defendant to sign the statement of the driver’s standing in the above report, stating that it is D or D in the driver’s name column, signed the above report, and used the driver’s name column in the statement of the driver’s standing statement in the above D’s name, which is a private document pertaining to the certification of facts, by suggesting that the control police officer was duly formed the above private document to the police officer who was aware of the fact.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Investigation report (Evidence Nos. 1 to 4, 7, 10);

1. The fact of crackdown on driving under drinking;

arrow