logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산고등법원 창원재판부 2016.6.15. 선고 (창원)2016누10209 판결
(창원)지정취소처분취소청구의소
Cases

(original)Action demanding revocation of the revocation of a disposition on revocation of designation;

Plaintiff-Appellant

A An incorporated association

Defendant Appellant

Head of the Busan Regional Employment and Labor Agency

The first instance judgment

Changwon District Court Decision 2015Guhap22514 Decided January 19, 2016

Conclusion of Pleadings

May 18, 2016

Imposition of Judgment

June 15, 2016

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1. Purport of claim

The revocation of designation of the workplace skill development training establishment rendered by the Defendant to the Plaintiff on August 20, 2015 is revoked.

The judgment of the first instance is revoked. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The reasoning for this Court’s explanation is the same as the reasoning for the judgment of the first instance court, and thus, this Court cites it as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act (it is not different from the fact-finding and judgment of the first instance court even considering the documents and evidence additionally submitted by the

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

Judges

The presiding judge, judge and Dong judge

Judges Choi Jin-jin

Judges Jeong-jin

arrow