2012. Revocation, etc. of revocation of recognition 1594

A

The Commissioner of the Busan Regional Labor Office;

Ulsan District Court Decision 2012Guhap14 Decided April 18, 2012

September 12, 2012

October 17, 2012

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

3. The Defendant’s revocation of recognition against the Plaintiff on December 26, 2011, and the restriction on recognition of the entrustment of the pertinent six-month course shall be suspended until the judgment of the first instance becomes final and conclusive.

1. Purport of claim

Recognition made by the Defendant on December 26, 201 to the Plaintiff on December 26, 2011, and revocation of restriction on recognition of entrustment of the relevant process for six months.

2. Purport of appeal

The judgment of the first instance is revoked. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The court's explanation of this case is the same as the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it can be accepted by Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit, and it is recognized that there is an urgent need to prevent damage which can be caused to the plaintiff due to the execution of the disposition of this case, and there is no other data to recognize that the suspension of the execution of the disposition of this case is likely to seriously affect public welfare. Thus, the execution of the disposition of this case shall be suspended by the time the judgment of the court of first instance becomes final and conclusive.

The presiding judge, judge and associate judge;

Judges Jeong-ho

Judges Kang Gyeong-hee