logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2020.09.22 2020고단3719
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On May 24, 2018, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 2 million as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Daegu District Court and KRW 11 million as a fine in the same court on May 1, 2020, respectively.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Around 01:50 on May 23, 2020, the Defendant driven a vehicle Ek 3 under the influence of alcohol level of 0.048% without obtaining a driver’s license from the parking lot at the C administrative welfare center located in Daegu Suwon-gu B to the same front road.

As a result, the defendant driving a motor vehicle without obtaining a driver's license, and violated the prohibition of drinking driving more than twice.

2. The Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act by regulating the violation of the Road Traffic Act on the roads of the Daegu Suwon-gu, Daegu-gu, the date and time stated in paragraph (1), and notified him of the Defendant’s pro-friendly resident registration number as the Defendant’s resident registration number as if he were the Defendant’s resident registration number.

Accordingly, the defendant used another person's resident registration number unlawfully.

3. The Defendant, at the time and time indicated in paragraph (1), committed as if he was the Defendant-friendly H who was subject to the control of drunk driving by G from the warning place indicated in paragraph (2) at the places indicated in paragraph (2) at the time and time indicated in paragraph (1), and had the control police officer enter the above H’s personal information and the violation of the Act, etc. in the PDA’s Transport Computer Network, and then forged the H’s signature in the column for the driver’s signature signature and presented it to the above control police officer who knew of such forgery.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged and used H’s signature for the purpose of exercising the right.

4. Paragraph 2. The defendant shall be the time and time stated in paragraph 1 to forge the private document and to display the private document.

arrow