1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

On January 10, 2002, the Plaintiff sold the forest land of KRW 14 million to Defendant B (4,297.52 square meters if converted) out of Defendant B (in a de facto marital relationship with the Plaintiff at the time of de facto marital relationship with the Plaintiff), Gyeonggi Pyeong-gun E (F on September 1, 2003, a lot number change registration is changed to F on September 1, 2003), and KRW 1,300 square meters (4,297.52 square meters if converted) of forest land of KRW 8,264 square meters (hereinafter referred to as “land before division”) to Defendant B. The Plaintiff entered into an agreement with Defendant B on January 10, 200 (the date of payment of the contract: KRW 20 million, the intermediate payment, KRW 30 million, and the time of receipt of Defendant B’s retirement benefits. The Plaintiff changed the forest land to the purpose of use, the Plaintiff bears the expenses, and the transfer of the name was made by Defendant B, and the construction (hereinafter referred to “instant”).

On November 16, 2002, the Plaintiff completed the registration of the right to claim ownership transfer on the ground of the pre-sale promise to Defendant B’s wife C with respect to the whole land before subdivision.

The land before the division was divided into 3,017 square meters and G forest land on September 1, 2005 and 5,247 square meters.

The Plaintiff, around November 5, 2010, sold the said G Forest land of KRW 5247 square meters (hereinafter “the instant forest”) to H for KRW 190 million, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on December 20, 2010.

On November 15, 2010, the Plaintiff deposited KRW 84 million out of the sales price to Defendant C.

On the other hand, the provisional registration remaining in the instant forest was cancelled on November 8, 2010 due to the cancellation on November 5, 2010, and the provisional registration remaining in the F farm site was cancelled on November 23, 2010 on November 26, 2010.

[Grounds for recognition] No. 2, Eul evidence No. 2, Eul evidence No. 2, and the plaintiff's assertion to the purport of the whole pleadings is as follows: although defendant Eul paid 7,035,000 won of the land before the division as purchase price of 1,300 won (sumpt 7,033,300 won) as follows, it is deceiving the plaintiff as if it paid 1,40 million won of the sale price of the forest of this case, and it is paid 84 million won of the land before the division of 190,000 won from the plaintiff.