logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.06.25 2015고단1333
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 18, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 22:50 on March 18, 2015, while drinking alcohol together with the victim E (the 49-year-old) who was a deep-time exhauster in the D cafeteria in Gwangju Northern-gu, the Defendant sent the victim’s mari by beer who was in danger of being on his/her customer, who was under the influence of alcohol and was in danger of being on his/her customer.

The Defendant continued to stop from F, the owner of the above restaurant, and took the scam, which is a dangerous object accumulated in a box outside the restaurant, which is a dangerous object accumulated in the entrance of the operator who has driven away from the restaurant, and entered the restaurant again into the restaurant, and made the victim’s head one time from the aftermath of the victim’s disease.

As a result, the defendant carried dangerous objects and carried them about about 14 days of treatment to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made by the police officer on F;

1. Statement prepared by E;

1. Photographs of victims and on-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. In light of the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, since the nature of the crime is not good, it is necessary to impose strict punishment. However, there are many criminal convictions against the defendant, but this is due to the previous crime in 1996, and the defendant paid one million won to the victim and agreed with the victim.

arrow