1. The Defendant’s KRW 11,632,00 and annual 5% from March 23, 2014 to September 4, 2015 to the Plaintiff.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Business name - Business name: Industrial complex development project (B international logistics city (stage 1): Defendant - Project operator: Defendant - Public announcement of project implementation authorization: D public announcement of Gangseo-gu Busan Metropolitan City on March 3, 201 - Busan Metropolitan City on July 6, 201; E public notification of the same public announcement made on August 28, 2013; G public notification made on September 4, 2013; HH of the same public notification made on December 11, 2013; and I public notification made on January 15, 2014;

B. The court's appraisal and compensation for losses for expropriation of the expropriation of the Busan Metropolitan City local Land Tribunal (hereinafter "the instant objection") and the court's appraisal and compensation for losses for expropriation of the expropriation subject to entrustment of appraisal by the Central Land Tribunal (hereinafter "court appraisal") and this court's appraisal and determination by the competent court (hereinafter "won") 91,76,400 of the Gangseo-gu Busan Metropolitan City Jan 519,926,500,500 of the above ground obstacles 519,926,500,549,284,000,53,469,100 in total 1,490,124,701,53,603,501,501,503,501,545,235,500: The purport of the court's appraisal and assessment of the first day of expropriation is without any dispute as to the overall appraisal and assessment of the appraiser's 213/2014.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is considerably low in light of the value of compensation for losses set forth in the instant judgment. Therefore, the Plaintiff’s claim for the difference between the reasonable amount of compensation based on the court appraisal and the amount of compensation set forth in the instant judgment and the compensation for delay.

B. In a lawsuit concerning an increase or decrease of land expropriation compensation, in the event that the appraisal by each appraisal agency and the appraisal by a court appraiser are not illegal in the appraisal methods and there is no other reason to believe that there is an error in the individual assessment comparison of land expropriation compensation, but there is no other evidence to acknowledge that there is an error in the appraisal result due to a somewhat different difference in the appraisal results, although the appraisal is consistent with each other in view of the remaining price assessment factors except for the individual assessment comparison.