1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 3,016,00 for Plaintiff A; and (b) KRW 2,421,00 for Plaintiff B; and (c) for each of them, from June 10, 2014 to July 3, 2015.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Business name - Project name: C (D general industrial complex): Defendant - The improvement project zone - Public notice of project implementation authorization: F of Busan Metropolitan City on March 3, 2010, G public notice of the Busan High Sea Free Economic Zone Authority on July 6, 201, H H of August 28, 2013, I of the same public notice on September 4, 201, J of December 11, 2013, and K of the same public notice on January 15, 2014

(b) The result of the adjudication of expropriation by the local Land Tribunal of Busan Metropolitan City, the adjudication of objection by the Central Land Tribunal (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "each adjudication of this case"), and the commission of appraisal by the appraiser L by this court of appraisal of the appraiser of this court - The appraisal compensation court of the plaintiff and the compensation for losses (unit of won) shall be 280,11,000 square meters and 286,067,600, 289,083, 600, Busan Gangseo-gu Busan Gangseo-gu, Busan Metropolitan City Nan case 1,345 square meters and 239,92,8302,942,942,000,002,363,00-249,363,00: June 9, 2014 / The purport of each appraisal of the appraisal compensation court as a whole is without dispute.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. Since the plaintiff's respective rulings in this case contain an error of law that does not specifically consider various factors on the objective requirements and calculation of compensation for each subject matter of expropriation, the plaintiff's reasonable compensation according to the court's appraisal and the difference between the amount of compensation and the amount of compensation determined by the judgment on objection, and the compensation for delay

B. In a lawsuit involving an increase or decrease of land expropriation compensation, in a case where the appraisal by each appraisal agency and the appraisal by a court appraiser are not illegal in the appraisal methods, and there is no other reason for the remaining price assessment factors except for the individual fault fault, but there is a difference in the appraisal result due to a somewhat different relation with the individual fault fault fault, one of them is subject to the appraisal.