beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 3,731,350 as well as the annual rate of KRW 5% from July 5, 2014 to September 17, 2015 to the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Details, etc. of ruling;
(a) Project name: Industrial complex development project (B international logistics city (stage 1), general industrial complex; hereinafter referred to as “instant improvement project”): Defendant - Rearrangement project area: Defendant - Busan Gangseo-gu Busan Gangseo-gu Busan Gangseo-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City public notice of approval for an industrial complex plan: D public notice of the Busan Metropolitan City public notice of March 3, 201, July 6, 201, G public notice of the aforesaid public notice on December 11, 201, G, and January 15, 2014;
B. The ruling of expropriation by the local Land Tribunal of Busan Metropolitan City on May 19, 2014 (hereinafter “the instant ruling of expropriation”) and the ruling of objection by the Central Land Tribunal on December 18, 2014 (hereinafter “the instant ruling”) and the court’s entrustment of appraisal by this court on December 18, 2014 - The starting date of expropriation: July 4, 2014 - As a result of the court’s entrustment of appraisal by this court, (won) as a result of the court’s entrustment of appraisal by this court on the expropriation of the subject matter of expropriation and the subject matter of compensation for loss - the purport of the entire appraisal by the appraiserJ of Gangseo-gu of Busan Metropolitan City (won) and the purport of this court’s entrustment of appraisal by this court on July 4, 2014
2. The assertion and judgment
A. The Plaintiff’s assertion was erroneous in failing to properly reflect the market price of the subject matter of expropriation, and the reasonable price of the subject matter of expropriation was KRW 298,508,00, which is the appraised value confirmed as a result of the instant court’s commission of appraisal. Thus, the Defendant calculated the Plaintiff’s difference of KRW 298,776,650, which is the difference between the appraised value and the compensation for losses recognized as a result of the instant court’s entrustment of appraisal, and KRW 294,776,650, which is the difference between the appraised value of KRW 3,737,350, which is the difference between the appraised value and the compensation for losses recognized as a result of the instant judgment, as well as KRW 294,776,650, which is 3,731,350, which is 294,770,650.
There is an obligation to pay damages for delay.
B. Determination 1.