logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2012.10.12 2012고단3392
업무방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. 피고인은 2012. 7. 14. 20:00경 용인시 처인구 B에 있는 피해자 C(여, 35세)이 운영하는 ‘D주점’에서 통닭과 맥주를 주문했는데 뻥튀기 서비스 안주를 주지 않는다는 이유로, 피해자에게 “씨팔! 닭하고 무만 주냐 ”며 큰소리를 지르고, 그 곳에서 술을 마시는 손님들에게 시비를 거는 등 소란을 피워 약 20분 정도 위력으로써 피해자의 음식점 영업을 방해하였다.

2.(a)

At around 20:25 on July 14, 2012, the Defendant: (a) requested the Defendant to return home at the same place, at the same time, the victim F, a policeman belonging to the Gandong Police Station E District Unit of the Gangseo-dong Police Station, who was dispatched after having reported the 112 report that “the fright of a drunk person fright,” and was called “the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the fright of the flo

B. At around 21:50 on July 14, 2012, the Defendant, even after being compelled to be a flagrant offender to the Defendant’s office at the Gangseo-dong Police Station and the office of the Jongno-dong Police Station, and on the grounds that there were three civil petitioners who were being investigated at the said place, and the victim G, a police officer, expressed that “if there is no error in the judgment, she should be arrested, she should be frighted, frighted, frighted, fright, fright, fright, fright, and fright, she should be sexualized.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made by the police in relation to C, H and G;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes written in the F Statement;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business) concerning criminal facts (the point of each insult of a fine) (the point of each insult of a fine, the choice of a fine, and the point of a full agreement with the victim C);

1. The punishment provided for in the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act concerning the most severe crime of interference with business shall be applicable to the punishment;

arrow