Text
1. The plaintiff's rehabilitation debtor B and the rehabilitation debtor, upon a claim converted in exchange by this court.
Reasons
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is as follows, except that part of the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance is dismissed as set forth in the following 2. Thus, this shall be cited pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act
2. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance in the part of the reasoning of the judgment shall be as follows: “B and C” except for the first, 16, 5, 15, 21, 6, 15, 300, 300,000,0000,0000,0000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000
e) 3 pages;
The following shall be added to the paragraphs:
F. On February 21, 2019, while continuing the instant appellate trial, the rehabilitation procedure was commenced on May 21, 2019 as the Seoul Rehabilitation Court 2018 Gohap10253, and as to B on May 21, 2019 as the Changwon District Court 2019 Gohap10036, respectively. The Plaintiff reported each of the above rehabilitation procedures as rehabilitation claims the amount of KRW 500,000,000, which was the Plaintiff’s claim for each of the above reported claims. However, the Defendants denied the Plaintiff’s respective reported claims and raised an objection thereto.
5. The portion from 12 12 e.g. to 14 e. “the e.g., the e., the e., the 15% annual rate” shall be deleted.
(c) Accordingly, the Plaintiff’s respective rehabilitation claims against B and C are damages for delay calculated at the rate of 6% per annum under the Commercial Act from November 6, 2018 to the date of full payment, which is the day following the last delivery of the application for the instant payment order, as well as from November 6, 2018 (the Plaintiff shall be 15% per annum under the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings until May 31, 2019; the damages for delay calculated at the rate of 12% per annum from the following day to the date of full payment; however, the claim for the confirmation of rehabilitation claims is asserted against the claims reported by the rehabilitation creditor, etc.