(영문) 서울고등법원 2020.01.08 2019나2027305

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울고등법원 2020.01.08 2019나2027305

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The defendant's main grounds for appeal citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, except the following additional parts, and even if the evidence submitted by this court is examined, the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are justified.

The reasoning of the judgment of this court is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal or addition as follows. Thus, it shall be cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

【Defendant A and B’s status as a party to the case of “Defendant A and B” as “Defendant Co-Defendant of the first instance trial” and “Defendant C” as “Defendant”.

The 3th five parallels of “gambling packaging materials” are used as “bambling packing materials,” the 3th three parallels of “stock companies” are deleted, and the 2nd parallels of the 4th parallels are used as “F Bank” and the 4th parallels of the 4th parallels and 5th parallels of “the Plaintiff and the Defendant B, and C” and the 6th parallels of the 6th parallels to 12.

The defendant's "the defendant" of the 5th 11 parallel is "the defendant and the co-defendant A, B", the 5th 14 parallels and the 8th 5th parallels "the defendant" as "the co-defendant A, B", the 6th 17 parallels "the defendant" as "the defendant," the 6th 20 parallels "after receiving the loan," and the 8th 6th parallels "the part of the complaint" as "the copy of the complaint," and the 8th 10 parallels "5%" as "5% and 5%" respectively.

8 The following shall be added to 3 pages:

The defendant asserts that there is no proximate causal relation between the defendant's deception and the plaintiff's loss, since the plaintiff did not pay the payment by subrogation to the FF bank according to the defendant's deception, but fulfilled the guarantee liability pursuant to the credit guarantee agreement in this case

However, each of the four occasions of this case is based on the plaintiff's guarantee, and there is no guarantee of the plaintiff.

참조조문

-민사소송법 제420조

유사 판례

-서울고등법원 2020.01.08 2019나2027305

-서울중앙지방법원 2020.11.10 2019나71679

-부산고등법원 2020.11.11 2019나57995

-서울고등법원 2019.06.13 2019나2000997

-서울고등법원 2019.04.17 2018나2054522