1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasons why the court has stated in this part of the underlying facts are stated in the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for addition, deletion or dismissal as follows:

(The main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act). The 3rd 12th 12 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be applied to the Intervenor joining the Defendant.

The list of attached Forms 4, 6, 5, 8 and 5 of the judgment of the first instance shall be used in the attached Form "attached Form", and all the attached Forms of the judgment of the first instance shall be replaced by the attached Form of this judgment.

The fourth and fourth parallels of the first instance judgment (hereinafter referred to as “S, T, and E”) shall be deleted, and the second parallels “S, T, and E” shall be written by inserting “S, T, and E.”.

After the fifth 2-3 of the judgment of the first instance, the term “acquisition” was added to the phrase “(other than T, excluding T, after the transfer of the status of the lender(s) under the loan agreement of this case)” (including U, U, and U.S.).

In the first instance judgment, the term “instant entrustment contract” (hereinafter collectively referred to as “instant entrustment contract”) shall be read as “the instant entrustment contract” and “the instant entrustment contract” respectively, and shall be read as “the instant entrustment contract” and “the instant entrustment contract.”

The 6th 2nd 3th 2th 2th 2th 2nd 3th 2010 of the judgment of the first instance, "Singman on February 19, 2013" shall be applied.

6.2.2.22.22.22.201.2.3.3.3.3.3.3.3.3.3.4.4.4.4.4.4.4.4.

In the first instance judgment, “(based on recognition”)” is added to “BA No. 19” and “the result of the obligor E’s response to the fact inquiry by this court to the obligor E Deposit Insurance Corporation.”

2. The plaintiff's assertion that the defendant sold the beneficiary certificates of this case even though the maturity under the loan agreement of this case was not yet due and the interest of time was not lost.

Since the term of loan and the principal and interest of S remain at the time, U.S. in this case.