The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On February 23, 2018, the Defendant: (a) made a fluor and telephone conversations at the “Gu viewer distance” square in the 125-ro, Gwangju-dong, Gwangju-dong, about 04:5 on February 23, 2018; and (b) the victim B (26) who was on the side was on the fluoral.

On the ground that it was said that “the victim was spit,” and was assaulted by the victim, such as spiting spits, brining the victim’s face with the hand floor, spits, etc.

2. The facts charged of the judgment cannot be prosecuted against the clearly expressed will of the victim in accordance with Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act as an offense falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act.

In this regard, the victim withdrawn his wish to punish the defendant on April 2, 2018, which was after the prosecution of this case, and the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.