The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. In the facts charged, the Defendant is between the victim B (45) and the society.

On July 27, 2018, at around 20:30 on July 27, 2018, the Defendant was aware that the Defendant had received the abusive language for the victim of the previous ordinary social group in Gwangju-dong, Gwangju-gu, or D, and that he was aware of it.

The victim of “I am at the time of the test that I am at the time of the chair. I am at the time of his face, bridge, etc. on the ground that I am at the time of “I am at the time of the chair. I am at the time of his face, bridge, etc.”

2. The facts charged of the judgment cannot be prosecuted against the clearly expressed will of the victim in accordance with Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act as an offense falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act.

Therefore, since the victim submitted a written agreement on August 29, 2018, which was after the prosecution of this case, and withdrawn his/her wish to punish the defendant, the prosecution is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.