Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. On June 25, 2017, the Defendant: (a) from around Crenk parking lots located in Crenk City B around 01:30 on June 25, 2017; (b) due to the Defendant’s baring of dogs located in the parking lot, the Defendant from the Defendant’s charges “Any d
For the reason of the fact that he was called the "Ieman", he assaulted the victim's left-hand knick floor once on the top of the victim.
2. The facts charged in the instant case are the crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s explicit intent pursuant to Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.
On July 31, 2017, after the institution of the instant prosecution, the victim D drafted a written agreement that the defendant does not want to be punished, and the said agreement was submitted to this court on August 7, 2017.
Therefore, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.