logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.10.18 2015나2010088
공사대금
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part of the judgment against the defendant is in excess of the amount ordered to be paid below.

Reasons

In light of the fact that there is no provision for calculation, the Plaintiffs’ assertion is not reasonable, and thus, the Plaintiffs’ assertion is not acceptable.

[3] Section 7 of the General Conditions of the Contract Amount to be adjusted

1. D. As regards the increased or decreased contract amount, indirect labor cost, industrial accident insurance premium and occupational health and safety management expenses, and general management cost and profit are to be added to the increased or decreased contract amount. Based on this, the final contract amount to be adjusted due to an increase in the period of use of the steel in this case is to be KRW 585,983,87 as listed below:

Items *1.2 Environmental Preservation Cost 2,159,30 won *1.88% of the cost of materials * 0.5% of the cost of materials 2,156,39,390 won *0.64% of the cost of materials * 22,974,957 won * 5.32% of the cost of materials *5.32% of the cost of materials *5.32% of the cost of raw materials * 5.32% of the total cost of raw materials 467,507 general management cost 20,595,295 won *1,687,41,41,482,425, 251, 36.5% of the cost of raw materials *65% of the cost of materials * 5.7% of the cost of materials d.5% of the cost of materials d.5% of the cost of raw materials d.37% of the plaintiffs.

arrow