beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor of two years and six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of three years, respectively.
Defendant No. 12 of the seized evidence.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
B, on November 2016, 2016, I would like to know the high income on the Internet website.
The Defendant received and consented to the proposal that “I will do so, scam, and scam only,” and the Defendant agreed to the proposal that “I will am scam.,” and that “E” was “E” from the “E,” and the Defendants and the Defendants and the “E” conspired that I would keep the accounts in the accounts in the names of the victims who are involved in a crime by misrepresenting the inspection of an unspecified number of victims, and that Defendant B would take the role of receiving money from the victims, and Defendant A would take the role of delivering the money received from Defendant B to the “E” to the name and the name and the name and the personal name of the victims.
1. Defendant B conspired to commit the “singing” crime with his name in the name and influence as seen above, and the victims were willing to forge an identification card under the name of the Financial Supervisory Service in order to deceiving the victims as if they were the employees of the Financial Supervisory Service.
On November 9, 2016, the Defendant entered “department financial support, position, employee, name G, and Financial Supervisory Service” by means of a computer at one’s home located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, 201 and 401, and then printed out to the Financial Supervisory Service, which was downloaded through the Internet, and the Defendant’s photograph file.
Accordingly, the Defendant forged an identification card under the name of the Financial Supervisory Service, which is a private document on the proof of facts.
2. On November 10, 2016, the Defendants’ fraud against the victim H, and Defendant B’s use of forged official document, the Defendants and their names influence, and one-time “E” to prove the victim as the victim, since the Defendants were the victim H by telephone at around 10:30 on November 10, 2016.