logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 속초지원 2019.06.26 2018고단339
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of B Poter trucks in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the Road Traffic Act;

On June 22, 2018, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle around 17:00, and proceeded with the road in front of the Jinsung-gun, Jinsung-gun, with one-lane road from the flooding point of view.

There is a place where the center line of yellow solid lines is installed, and at the time, the Defendant was driving the E-to-be driven by the victim D, and thus, the Defendant engaged in driving service has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance, such as taking a good look at the situation of the O-to-be, securing a safe distance to avoid the O-to-bea, and securing a safe distance to avoid the O-to-bea.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and proceeded on the left side of the motor bicycle because he was negligent in going beyond the center line to the left side of the above Oral Sea to overtake the above Oral Sea which was going on the front side, and did not avoid the above Oral Sea to the left side of the above Oral Sea, and did not go to the left part of the motor vehicle to the right side of the motor vehicle driving the motor vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant, by the above occupational negligence, inflicted injury on the victim F (V, 77 years of age) to the victim F, who was on the ground of the above occupational negligence, such as a dubation of a dub that requires approximately 8 weeks medical treatment, and at the same time, damaged the victim D to have approximately 130,000 won of the repair cost.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act is the holder of B Poter Cargo.

No automobile which is not covered by mandatory insurance shall be operated on a road.

Nevertheless, the Defendant operated the foregoing cargo vehicle without mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in Paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement of D and F;

1. Report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, report on the actual condition of the traffic accident, report on actual condition of the traffic accident, field pictures, tea inquiries, mandatory insurance inquiries, investigation reports ( inquiry into the history of purchasing insurance);

arrow