logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.09.13 2018고단29
아동복지법위반(아동학대)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant, as a teacher of C kindergarten D in Gwangju Mine-gu, is a child abuse report-free person, and the victim E (son, F) is the original student of the above D.

1. On July 24, 2017, the Defendant committed the crime at around 12:42 of the above D class on July 24, 2017, on the ground that the victim did not have boomed boomed with drinking at a later time than other originals, even though the point of time has not yet expired, the victim cannot participate in the class between about 12 minutes after putting the victim's winter boom in front of the classroom in which the victim frighted and frighted into the part of the classroom in which the victim got the victim, and around 14:26 of the same day, while the victim engaged in the frighting operation in the above classroom at around 14:26 of the same day, the victim did so to other originals of the victim, making the victim do so before the classroom door, and found that the victim had a frightd frighting food among other originals and frighted the victim's life.

As a result, the defendant stated that the prosecutor of emotional abuse, which harms the mental health and development of the victim, only "an abuse that may harm emotional development" was stated in the changed facts charged, but the defendant corrected it ex officio in accordance with the requirements for the composition of the law.

A. Before 200:

[Public Prosecutor] In this part of the facts charged, the Defendant could not enter the classroom with approximately 12 minutes while leading the victim out of the classroom.

“.....”

However, the evidence on this part is not clear that CCTV images taken at the time are the only one, and that the defendant led the victim to the outside of the classroom.

On the other hand, the defendant was able to sit up the victim in front of the internal classroom, not outside the classroom, and returned to the job.

The above CCTV images (see the protocol of interrogation of suspect) seem to occur in the inner door of the classroom before the defendant and the victim, which are not more than 12:54:12.

arrow