logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2019.05.24 2018고단2570
상해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 1, 2018, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties: (a) around 21:55, on the street in front of “C” located in Jeju Island B, and reported on “C” 112, that “A driver who has caused a traffic accident suspected of drinking,” and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning handling 112 reports and the investigation of drinking driving, etc., by having the police officer E (38 years old) assigned to the Jeju East Police Station D (a police station) who called out after having received the notification of 112 “A driver who has caused a traffic accident suspected of drinking.” At the Defendant’s request for collection of blood, the police officer sent to the police officer E (38 years old) asked the Defendant at the rear seat of the patrol and asked him for drinking

2. The obstruction of performance of official duties and the Defendant: (a) assaulted a police officer as described in paragraph (1), arrested a flagrant offender for the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties; and (b) was transferred to a police box of the Jeju East Police Station around October 1, 2018.

On October 1, 2018, at around 23:52, the Defendant attempted to injure, without any justifiable reason, the head of the above police box, and attempted to escape the wall. The Defendant asked the victim Francing Fel who is a police officer belonging to the above police box (the age of 26) to attack the Defendant, thereby interfering with the legitimate performance of duties by the police officer in relation to the investigation, etc., and at the same time, inflicted an injury on the part of the victim with the days of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by the defendant in this court;

1. Statement of the suspect interrogation protocol on the accused prepared by the police;

1. Statement of statement E prepared by the police officer;

1. A statement prepared in the F;

1. Each investigation report (Attachment to the relevant images, etc. / The degree of damage inflicted upon the victim) prepared by the police officer, each statement or image (the accompanying documents shall include accompanying documents);

1. Entry of a report processing list of 112 reported cases prepared by the police;

1. Application of each relevant video statute to each relevant photograph;

1. The first point of the ruling on the relevant legal provision concerning criminal facts: The act that interferes with the performance of duties by police officers in Article 136(1)2 of the Criminal Act: the victim F in Article 136(1)2 of the Criminal Act.

arrow