A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[2014 Highest 293] Around January 15, 2014, the Defendant expressed that D slope, who was arrested and detained as an offender in the act of assault in the act of assault at the House C District of the Busan Highest Police Station located in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si, Seoul, would be "a sprinke gue feb feb" and requested D to refrain from taking a bath to the Defendant. As D demanded D to refrain from taking a bath to the Defendant, the Defendant exercised violence by using D's febb feb, etc., on his own hand, thereby obstructing the police officer's legitimate performance of duties for criminal investigation and suppression.

[2014 Highest 493]

1. Around 22:35 on January 14, 2014, the Defendant’s insultd the victim by openly insulting the victim by having the Defendant “F” in front of a restaurant in Bupyeong-gu, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, the Defendant received a 112 report to the effect that the Defendant was unable to exercise violence and pay food or drink, and was urged by the victim G from the police officer belonging to the Busan High Police Station C District District, which was called out by the Defendant, and the number of unspecified people were only, and the Defendant expressed the victim’s desire to read “a dog, dead, dead, fluen, fluencing, and fluencing.”

2. On January 15, 2014, the Defendant: (a) at the entrance of the examination team in the House-U.S. police station located in Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si; (b) was arrested as a flagrant offender for the same reason under the foregoing G for the same reason; and (c) was transferred to a police station via the earth via the earth for the same reason; (d) the Defendant used violence on the part of the police officer for the first time due to the outbreak of the first vehicle following his own G, thereby obstructing the police officer from performing his legitimate duties in relation to criminal investigation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police officer's statement about D and G;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the C District Work Site, a complaint, a copy of the work site, and each investigation report;

1. Relevant Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing performance of official duties), Article 311 of the Criminal Act and imprisonment with prison labor, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act: