logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.12.18 2014고단3604
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. 업무방해 피고인은 2014. 9. 26. 17:30경 대전 서구 C에 있는 한국마사회 D지사 건물 로비, 출입구, 건물 출입구 앞 길가 등지에서 피고인이 예전에 암표를 팔다가 적발된 사례가 있어 위 한국마사회 D지사 경비대장 E 등 경비원 3명으로부터 건물 출입을 통제당하자 화가 나서 약 40분에 걸쳐 "씨발놈, 개새끼 본부장 나와라."라고 욕설을 하고, 위 한국마사회에서 설치한 시설물 등을 발로 찼다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the building security service by the D branch of the Korean Racing Association.

2. The Defendant was asked to avoid the Defendant’s act and to state his personal information on the date, time, and place specified in paragraph (1) of the same Article, from G around the Daejeon Police Station G located in the Daejeon Police Station where he was called out after receiving a report by the Defendant that he was frighted.

Accordingly, the Defendant heard the above G that “A police officer ought to take a bath that “A police officer is an interference with the police officer, friend, friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend, friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend, friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend friend

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning crime prevention and suppression.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to G and E;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstruction of performance of official duties and the choice of fines) concerning criminal facts;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the defendant was the first offender who has no previous criminal record, and the defendant was committed for committing the crime.

arrow