logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2016.04.08 2015고정764
명예훼손
Text

The Defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment of this case is publicly notified.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is a pastor, and on February 6, 2014, the Defendant was dismissed from the position of professor at G University on the first floor coffee of Jongno-gu Seoul E-building on February 6, 2014, notwithstanding the fact that he/she was not false, nor was he/she dismissed from the position of professor at G University due to false academic background, the Defendant was dismissed from the position of professor at the 30th floor conference conference of the above place.

In other words, the honor of the complainant was damaged.

2. Determination

A. In view of the recording CD in which the Defendant’s entire statement was recorded at the time of the instant case, the Defendant did not mention that “the Defendant was all false academic background of the complainants,” and that “the complainant was dismissed from G college due to a false academic background” did not mention.

There was no suspicion as to whether the complainant graduated from a middle or high school.

A personal statement submitted by the complainant to the ASEAN;

m. The study year of the Div course is recorded differently, and the resume of the petition is also written with false content.

It means that a person who is not a person without no school, but a person who is not a person without school, has forged his or her academic achievement.

It is important to say that false records have been made on the curriculum vitae and personal card submitted to the Chungcheong Labor Council.

B. The main contents of the Defendant’s statement at the time of the instant case are as follows.

We examine whether the Defendant’s remarks as above can be evaluated as having made a statement to the effect that “all of the academic background of the complainants is false.”

(c)

First of all, the Defendant’s statement that “I am am son’s non-school, and I am am son’s non-school, and I am am son’s non-school, which means that I am son’s non-school life is forged.”

In the process of responding, the context before and after the above remarks.

arrow