logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2017.12.22.선고 2017도15613 판결
공직선거법위반
Cases

2017Do15613 Violation of the Public Official Election Act

Defendant

A person shall be appointed.

Appellant

Defendant

Defense Counsel

Law Firm (LLC) CE, Attorneys CL, CF, CG, CH

Judgment of the lower court

Gwangju High Court ( Jeonju) Decision 2017No89 Decided September 15, 2017

Imposition of Judgment

December 22, 2017

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal are examined (to the extent of supplement in case of supplemental appellate briefs not timely filed).

Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the evidence duly admitted by the lower court, it is justifiable for the lower court to have found all of the facts charged in the instant case guilty on the grounds stated in its reasoning. In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the statute of limitations and public prosecution, the admissibility of illegally collected evidence and derivative evidence

Meanwhile, Article 58(1) of the Public Official Election Act does not violate the principle of clarity of the principle of no punishment without law (see Supreme Court Order 2007Hu232, Oct. 11, 2007) and Article 60(1)4 of the Public Official Election Act does not violate the principle of no punishment without law (see Supreme Court Decision 200456168, Jul. 28, 2006, etc.). Accordingly, the grounds of appeal related thereto cannot be accepted.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

Justices Park Jae-young

Justices Kim Jae-hyung

Justices Park Young-young

Justices Kim Chang-suk

Justices Lee Dong-won

arrow