Text
1. The defendant shall support the plaintiffs with respect to the area of 928 square meters before E in Pakistan-si, Gyeonggi-do.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. According to the forest survey report prepared by the Japanese occupation occupation period, the Gyeonggi-do forest land in the Pakistan-gun of Pakistan-gun (hereinafter “Before land restoration”) was under the circumstances of “H” with the domicile in “Seoul-gun Gri,” and is currently unregistered, and there was no registration of the owner on the land cadastre.
B. A copy of I, the plaintiffs' assistant, stated the "J of Goyang-gun in Yangyang-gun in Seoul and the "J of Goyang-do" and "J of Gosung-gun K family L," and the Seongbuk-gu Seoul Dong was indicated as the Goyang-gun Gri in Gyeonggi-do on April 1, 1914 and the Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Mdong on October 1, 1946.
C. On October 17, 1956, the plaintiffs' father-in, died on October 17, 1956 and succeeded to the property independently by the head of South-Nam N. N on June 13, 1979, and after N died on June 13, 1979, the plaintiff A, who is the wife and the head of family heir, jointly succeeded to the property jointly with 1/15 shares, respectively. The plaintiff D inherited the property solely after the death of the above P on November 30, 1981, and the plaintiffs jointly succeeded to the above 6/15 shares, respectively, after the death of theO on March 22, 200, 3/6 [6/15 (6/15/15 x 15/14) x 15/164] x 16/15 (15/16] of the plaintiffs.
On February 13, 2013, the land before the cadastral restoration was cadastrally restored to E, 928 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”).
On the other hand, on September 9, 1963, the registration of ownership preservation (hereinafter “previous registration of ownership preservation”) was completed with respect to the land indicated as “one single unit map of F Forest in Hongju-si” in the title section.
On the other hand, in the case of “Rinari-gun”, there was “F” land in addition to the land prior to the cadastral restoration. At the time of the Japanese occupation of occupation, the land prior to the cadastral restoration was circumstances to H, and F were circumstances to L.
Since then, F land assessed against L is divided into S through T, U, V, W and X, and there is a land cadastre and a copy of the register for each lot number.
E. The plaintiffs are the defendants in this court.