1. It is confirmed that the 3/6 equity interest in the 928 square meters of the E preceding 928 square meters in Pakistan is owned by Plaintiff A, and 1/6 equity interest in Plaintiff B, C, and D.

2...

1. Basic facts

A. The land indicated in paragraph (1) of the Disposition (forest protocol is marked as “F in Pacific City”; hereinafter “instant land”) was under the circumstances of “H” located in “Seoul-gun G,” and is currently unregistered and is not registered as its owner on the land cadastre.

B. A copy of I, the plaintiffs' assistant, stated the "J of Goyang-gun in Yangyang-gun in Seoul and the "J of Goyang-do" and the "J of Gosung-gun K family L," and the Seongbuk-gu Seoul M was indicated as the G of Goyang-gun in Gyeonggi-do on April 1, 1914 and as the Dongdaemun-gu Seoul on October 1, 1946.

C. On October 17, 1956, the plaintiffs' father-in, died on October 17, 1956 and succeeded to the property independently by the head of South-Nam N. N on June 13, 1979, and after N died on June 13, 1979, the plaintiff A, who is the wife and the head of family heir, jointly succeeded to the property jointly with 1/15 shares, respectively. The plaintiff D inherited the property solely after the death of the above P on November 30, 1981, and the plaintiffs jointly succeeded to the above 6/15 shares, respectively, after the death of theO on March 22, 200, 3/6 [6/15 (6/15/15 x 15/14) x 15/164] x 16/15 (15/16] of the plaintiffs.

[Ground of recognition] Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3 and 6 through 8, fact-finding results on the strike market by this court, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. In light of the following circumstances, the judgment of the cause of the claim is based on the above facts and the records of evidence Nos. 4 and 5, and the purport of the entire pleadings, it is determined that the Plaintiffs’ conciliation division I and H, who are the circumstances, are the same.

① The Plaintiff’s father-man I and H, the well-known name, were the same as one of his well-known names, and were residing in Goyang-gun G.

② At the time of the assessment of the instant land, there was no other person in the name of H, in addition to the Plaintiff’s assistance division, in the Goyang-gun G.

③ The situation transfer of Qu-gun’s forest land is “H” with the domicile in “Seoul-gun G,” and the above is the case.