beta
Text
1. Of the instant lawsuit, the part concerning the claim for compensation for losses against Q 334 square meters in Q 334 square meters shall be dismissed, respectively.
2. The defendant.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Gyeonggi-gun R Land Survey Board prepared during the Japanese occupation period is indicated in the Gyeonggi-gun Land Survey Board as follows: (a) 4,589 U.S. and 685 U.S. response 6,585 U.S. (hereinafter “1-assessment land”).
B. On August 1, 1964, the land of the first instance was destroyed due to the Korean War, and was divided into a 1,255 square meters and a X bank 50 square meters on April 7, 1979, following the change of land category, the conversion of the area, and the change of the name of the administrative district. On July 16, 2010, due to the change of the administrative district name, the said W bank 1,255 square meters were the YY bank 1,255 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”), and the above X bank 50 square meters (hereinafter “the second land”).
C. On August 1, 1961, the land of the second assessment was destroyed due to the Korean War, and the land of the second assessment was divided into the land on May 1, 1978, by the Gyeonggi-gun Q 334 square meters in Q 334 square meters in size, which was divided from the land of the second assessment on May 1, 1978, and due to the change of the name of the administrative district, the divided land was 334 square meters in Q 334 square meters in size (hereinafter “third land of this case”) in Q 334 square meters in size (hereinafter “each land of this case”) as of March 1, 196 due to the change of the name of the administrative district.
The land Nos. 1 and 2 of this case was completed on June 20, 1996, while the land No. 3 of this case was completed on July 18, 1996 in the name of the State.
E. On the other hand, T, the plaintiffs' preference, had a domicile in the Gyeonggi-gu E, but both AB of AA succeeds to Australia, and AB died on June 18, 1975, after which the plaintiffs succeeded to AB as shown in the Attached Table 1, and finally succeeded to AB's property, such as the inheritance share and claim amount in the Attached Table 2, as indicated in the inheritance share sheet.
[Reasons for Recognition] Each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 7, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The assertion and judgment
A. The plaintiffs' assertion.