logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2019.01.17 2018고합235
특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(사기)
Text

The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant, the representative director of the cosmetics export company B, and there is no intention or ability to prepare a notarized statement to the effect that he has the ownership of the above commercial real estate and the disposal authority is the victim even if he purchases the above commercial real estate in the name D by receiving money from the victim, he/she would not obtain Chinese commercial building from the victim C who is a representative director of the cosmetics export company B. It is possible to obtain Chinese commercial building in the name of a foreigner in China, and that if he/she purchases the above commercial building under the name of "China He/she owns the above commercial real estate F and G", he/she would make the victim obtain a notarized statement to the effect that he/she has the ownership of the above commercial real estate and the disposal authority is the victim.

The Defendant, on the 23th of the same month, shall have the victim deposit 50,000 won (8,750,000 won) with the financial account of the I, a manager in charge of the sale of the above commercial real estate, in the E Commercial EF and G contract deposit on the 24th of the same month. The above bank deposit 4,10,000 won (7,1750,000 won) with the above I's financial account as the intermediary fee of the above commercial building on the 24th of the same month. The above bank deposit 1,954,01 bill (34,1950,00 won) with the real estate management account of J on the 19th sale price of the above commercial building (34,1950,000 won) with the real estate management account of J on the 2013.

arrow