A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On August 2007, the Defendant, at the time of the Dogdong-gu, China's Dogdong-gu, Dogdong-gu, Dogdong-gu, was able to engage in a fluorial Dogdong-gu, a considerable fluorial Dog in the first half of the victim B ( South, 37 years old).

1. On July 2008, the Defendant in the name of the principal sales expense was the victim’s office located in the Defendant’s office located in the Si of the Dogdong-gu, Dogdong-gu, China, with the value equivalent to KRW 30 million in Chinese money, which was purchased from the Chinese senior personnel management. The Defendant in the name of the principal sales expense was worth KRW 50 million in Chinese money.

30% of the profits obtained by deducting taxes, etc. from the sales proceeds of the head of the household, if the expenses are insufficient to sell this head, and thus the expenses are loaned.

“A false statement was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, at the time of fact, the head of the above water order had no value equivalent to 30 million Chinese money, and the defendant thought that he would use the considerable part of the money received from the injured person for personal purposes, such as living expenses. The defendant sold the above water order and did not have the intent or ability to properly reduce profits to the injured person.

Ultimately, on July 2008, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim; (b) received, from the victim of the above Defendant’s office, a payment of KRW 50,000,000,000 from the Chinese Government money for the principal sales expense; (c) received, around October 2008, a delivery of KRW 50,000,000 from the same place of business at the same time, and received approximately KRW 10,000,000 from the Defendant’s D bank account; and (d) received, around March 25, 2009, KRW 28,000,000,000 from the Defendant’s D bank account.

2. On April 11, 201, the Defendant who is liable for the joint and several liability liability is liable for the said victim’s debt guarantee to borrow KRW 200 million from the wife South E because of the need for business funds. There is any problem with the repayment of the loan borrowed on the face of the loan.