beta
Text
1. The Defendants jointly and severally agreed to the Plaintiff KRW 38,625,117, and 5% per annum from October 3, 201 to March 20, 2015.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. (i) On October 17:15, 201, B driven a C Car (hereinafter “instant vehicle”) and driven the front road in front of the instant vehicle in the egrative city map slive ginseng farming corporation, on the surface of the magrative road from the egrative surface to the egrative surface of the water.
Shebly, the place is a road in a narrow side without a separation facility of the sidewalk and the roadway, and the two are engaged in the vehicle driving duty, and there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely driving the steering gear and the brake system.
Article 22(1) of the former Act provides that “A person who has neglected his duty of care and neglected his duty of care and did not discover the plaintiff on the right side of the road in the last place of the road in the last place and received the full part of the vehicle in the last place of the vehicle in this case.” Accordingly, the plaintiff suffered injury to the left side of the vehicle in this case, such as the left side of the sleak sleak sleak, the sleak
(hereinafter referred to as “the instant accident”). The Defendant East Fire Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. is an insurer who entered into an automobile insurance contract with respect to the instant vehicle, and Defendant Hyundai Capital Co., Ltd is the owner of the instant vehicle.
【Ground for Recognition: Facts without dispute, entries in Gap evidence 1-3, 9, 10, and the purport of the whole pleadings】
B. According to the above facts of determination, Defendant Dongdong Fire Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. is the insurer of the instant vehicle, and Defendant Hyundai Capital Co., Ltd. is jointly and severally liable for the damages incurred by the Plaintiff as the owner of the instant vehicle.
C. However, in full view of the circumstances leading up to the recognition of the accident as seen earlier, the fact that the accident of this case occurred due to the competition of the Plaintiff, which was committed on the narrow side of the two-lane main roads, may be recognized. Such circumstance is the occurrence of damage caused by the accident of this case.