logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.06.22 2016가단47889
구상금
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

(a) Defendant A and B jointly KRW 139,491,080;

B. Defendant East Fire & Marine Insurance Co., Ltd.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. (1) The Plaintiff is an insurer who has entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with C and C to compensate within the extent set forth in the terms and conditions, when the registered insured person C, the insurance period from March 13, 2014 to March 13, 2015, and in the case of injury caused by an non-life-free motor vehicle among security matters, the registered insured person or his/her spouse, children, etc. died or were injured due to an accident occurred by a motor vehicle or an non-life-free motor vehicle.

(2) Defendant A is the driver of Eexton vehicle, and Defendant B is the mother of Defendant A and the owner of the above vehicle.

(3) Defendant East Fire & Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd”) is an insurer who has concluded an automobile liability insurance contract with respect to the G MT freight vehicles in F drivers.

B. (1) On May 13, 2014, the traffic accident occurred (1) around 09:05, Defendant A driven the fexton vehicle and proceeded at a speed of about 91 km in the speed of about the speed of 91 km from the surface of the emulpode to the surface of the air at the speed of the speed of 51 km from the surface of the emulpode of the emulpode of the Kimpode, the emulpode of which is located in the direction of the six-lane. Defendant A left the lane due to the emulpode of the emulpora, and then died at the right side of the f driver’s above emulti vehicle that was stopped on the right side of the fifton vehicle at that time.

(2) At the time of the accident, F was stopping a vehicle on the side of the expressway without any inevitable reason, and even did not install a sign on the rear side of the expressway.

C. (1) The Plaintiff is liable to pay insurance money to the Plaintiff on June 3, 2014, based on the relationship between the Maternton vehicle and the Mamat vehicle only subscribed to liability insurance, according to the non-life insurance contract entered into with C, and based on the non-life insurance contract entered into with C.

6.9. C Insurance proceeds of KRW 239,491,080 in total as damages.

arrow