logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2012. 12. 13. 선고 2012두19403 판결
(심리불속행) 기존주주인 개인이 신주인수권을 포기하고 제3자인 법인이 신주인수로 인하여 분여받은 이익은 익금에 산입됨[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court 2011Nu21449 (2012.06)

Case Number of the previous trial

early 2010 Heavy357 ( December 31, 2010)

Title

(D) The profits received by an individual who is an existing shareholder shall be included in the calculation of earnings by giving up the preemptive right and by a third party corporation based on the subscription of new shares.

Summary

In case where an individual, who is the existing shareholder of the newly issued corporation, has renounced the preemptive right and a third party corporation, other than the existing shareholder of the newly issued corporation, has acquired new shares, the profits distributed by several new shares due to such new shares acquisition shall be included in the gross income of several new shares under the Corporate Tax Act.

Cases

2012Du19403 Revocation of Disposition of Corporate Tax Imposition

Plaintiff-Appellant

XX Stock Company

Defendant-Appellee

Head of the Suwon Tax Office and one other

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 2011Nu21449 Decided July 6, 2012

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

While examining the grounds of appeal in comparison with the records of this case and the judgment of the court below, the ground of appeal on the grounds of appeal is not deemed to have been rejected or not.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

Reference materials.

If the grounds for final appeal are not included in the grounds of appeal that make it appropriate for the court of final appeal to become a legal trial, such as matters concerning significant violation of Acts and subordinate statutes, etc., the system of final appeal will not continue to proceed with the deliberation on the merits of the grounds for final appeal, but will not proceed with the deliberation on the merits of the grounds for final

arrow