1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 176,520,521 for each of the Plaintiff A and B; and (b) KRW 10,000,00 for each of the Plaintiff C; and (c) for this, from October 1, 2017 to October 2019.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. Facts of recognition 1) Network E (hereinafter “the deceased”).

On October 1, 2017, a person driving a 04:20 Amburged car and driving it into two lanes near the 89.8km in the south Sea Highway, which is located on the waters of Jinju at the time of Busan at the point of Busan at the point of 89.8km, and finds out the fallings of the front bank, and immediately avoid it to the left side, so that the central separation zone is shocked and stopped on the two-lanes. FFF MFF car (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant vehicle”).

A) On the other hand, the driver found the deceased’s spatur-tur-tur-tur-tur-tur-tur-tur-tur-tur-tur-tur-tur-tur-tur-tur-tur-tur-tur-tur-tur-tur-tur-tur-tur-tur-tur-tur-tur-tur-tur-tur-tur-tur-tur-tur-tur-tur-tur-tur-tur-tur-tur-tur-tur-tur-tur-

(2) Plaintiff A and B are the parents of the Deceased, and Plaintiff C are the siblings of the Deceased.

The defendant is an insurer who has entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with the defendant vehicle owner.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 2 to Gap evidence 4, Eul evidence 1 to Eul evidence 1 (including branch numbers), the purport of whole pleadings

B. According to the fact that the accident in this case occurred during the operation of the Defendant’s vehicle, the Defendant, the insurer, is liable to compensate the Plaintiff A, B, and C, the deceased’s heir, for the damage caused by the accident in this case.

However, it is difficult to expect that a vehicle will stop on an expressway at night to become a person on the road, and considering the fact that it was difficult to discover the deceased as a driver of the Defendant vehicle because it did not turn on emergency lights on the deceased’s vehicle at night, the Defendant’s liability is limited to 60%.

The defendant asserts that the accident of this case is at least 70% of the deceased's negligence.