The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The Defendant is a person who is living in C 402.

On July 25, 2017, from around 08:35 to around 08:40 on the same day, the Defendant used the victim D (13 taxes)’s string in the stairs between C2 and C3 stories, which had been put in his hands, and used by the Defendant. The Defendant assaulted the victim and the victim, her mother, and her fluor in the process of a dispute with the fluorbbbbbing in the lus.

2. Determination

A. The burden of proving the facts charged in a criminal trial is to be borne by the public prosecutor, and the conviction of guilt is to be based on evidence with probative value sufficient to cause a judge to believe that the facts charged are true beyond a reasonable doubt. Thus, if there is no such evidence, even if there is doubt of guilt against the defendant (see Supreme Court Decision 2011Do7261, Nov. 10, 201, etc.), the interest of the defendant should be determined in the interests of the defendant (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2011Do7261, Nov. 10, 201).

was stated.

On the other hand, even though the Defendant consistently brought a dispute between the investigative agency and the victim’s mother-child and the victim’s mother-child, the Defendant did not agree with the victim’s recycling gambling. However, the Defendant stated that the victim was only a citizen of the above recycling gambling in order to prevent the victim from being injured, while sustaining a recycling gambling.

(c)

At the same time, E was the neighbor of the defendant and the victim at the scene where the defendant had a verbal dispute with the victim, but E was in a neutral position with respect to this case in this court.