logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.04.16 2013고단6262 (1)
장물취득
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 2, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon Branch on May 2, 2013, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on May 10, 2013.

C acquires smartphones which are lost or stolen, and exports them to the Republic of Korea, and the Defendant and D purchased smartphones, which are stolen, from taxi officers in the name of the Defendant and D, and E took part in purchasing smartphones, which are stolen, by sharing their roles as secondary purchasing policies that deliver smartphones purchased by the said Defendant, etc. to C.

E around September 23:30 on September 5, 2012, in order to show the method of purchasing a stolen smartphone to Defendant and D, the E stopped a taxi operating in the vicinity of the National University located in Seoyangdong 1, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and purchased 50,000 won in cash with knowledge of the fact that the victim was lost in his name from the taxi engineer, and issued 600,000 won in advance to Defendant and D with each of the above method while purchasing the smartphones. The Defendant and D, in accordance with the instructions, knew of the fact that the victim was lost in his name and lost in his name, ordered the victims to buy the smartphones in the above way, while purchasing the smartphones from the victims who was lost in his name and lost the smartphones (the victims who was lost in his name and lost the smartphones).

E received six smartphones from the Defendant and D, around September 2012, the smartphones collected to C above in the vicinity of the Daegu-gu Man-gu Roster and one smartphone purchased by oneself were transferred to seven smartphones in total.

Accordingly, the defendant acquired stolens in collusion with D, E, and C.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the accused in the fifth trial records;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol of D and E.

arrow