beta
Text
1. The Plaintiff:
A. Defendants B and 1, each of the news costs of KRW 10,000,000, and the news costs of KRW 13,000 from G to August 13, 2014.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On August 28, 2013, the National Intelligence Service carried out search and seizure in various places regarding the charge of conspiracy of insurrection by the organization called K Lparty members and M.
B. Defendant News 1 posted an article in attached Form 1 prepared by Defendant B (hereinafter “instant report 1”) as the title “N” on the Internet homepage of “NEW1” operated by G.
The foregoing article is a travel agent that mainly sells O and P tour goods among 18 facilities related to the L Party, seized and seized by the National Intelligence Service on the 28th day prior to the 28th day, and includes the Plaintiff, a subsidiary of the election agent Q, operated by the KSA. The National Intelligence Service deemed that this company played the role of funding M. The detention warrant requested by the prosecution and the National Intelligence Service against the K Assembly. The 30th day includes the following contents: (a) the M subscription procedure is written in detail; and (b) according to this, it was required to take an oath, such as “R” and “S,” in order to join the MO organization.
C. The Defendant’s channel broadcasted the news of the “channel” program of the H general programming broadcast channel, as indicated in the attached Table 2 (hereinafter “instant news report”).
While the above news shows the Plaintiff’s external appearance and the website image, and shows the caption of “Stop” and “Stop seizure and search” among Q subsidiaries, Defendant C, who was affiliated with the Defendant’s channel, included the Plaintiff’s office while searching up at least 18 of the 28th underground revolution organization, including the Plaintiff’s home and office. The Plaintiff, who mainly sold O and P to the Defendant, is the subsidiaries of Q to which the K Assembly member was the representative director. The NIS reported that “S to be deemed as having served as the source of funds,” and that it was known that the account book, etc. was seized.”