1. Attached Form among the dispositions rejecting the disclosure of information made against the Plaintiff B on December 12, 2017 by the Defendant

1. The information listed in the Schedule 4 shall be attached.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff A, as a new father of a religious organization, has been working as the representative of the D organization since 2015.

Plaintiff

B as the consideration of E Religious Organizations (F) held office from 2006 to 2010 as G.

B. On June 19, 2017, the National Intelligence Service’s news materials reported by the National Intelligence Service Reform Committee investigated the suspicion of political interventions by the National Intelligence Service and launched the Reform Committee to reform the National Intelligence Service.

On November 6, 2017, the National Intelligence Service distributed news materials stating that “The National Intelligence Service’s Reform Committee reported the outcome of investigation on the “H case,” etc. from the enemy-end T/F and recommended the Prosecutor to investigate the case.”

C. The Defendant requested the investigation of the prosecution to the prosecution and the relevant criminal case to the prosecution. Nonparty J, one of the former National Intelligence Service I, was prosecuted on May 4, 2018 for violating the National Intelligence Service Act.

On August 17, 2018, the first instance court (Seoul Central District Court 2018Gohap466) sentenced the J to one year of imprisonment and one year of suspension of qualification, and the second instance court (Seoul High Court 2018No2391) accepted the allegation of unfair sentencing by the J on February 14, 2019 and sentenced seven months of imprisonment and suspension of qualification.

Since then, the appeal by J is pending in the Supreme Court(2019Do3596).

The information disclosure request of the plaintiffs, etc. and the defendant's refusal decision 1) the plaintiffs, K (LA superintendent), M (Professor of NA),O (Secretary General of P Organization), Q (S organization composed of joint representatives of R organization, etc.) decided to carry out a campaign for requesting direct information disclosure to the defendant in order to urge the disclosure, deletion, and destruction of illegal inspection information.

Accordingly, on November 9, 2017, the plaintiffs et al. were directly or indirectly involved by the National Intelligence Service and requested the disclosure of information on the plaintiffs et al.