All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds of appeal is that the victim read the judgment prior to the commencement of towing, and the Defendants made a statement after the completion of towing, and thus the Defendants did not interfere with towing (misunderstanding of facts). Even if the Defendants were to have been engaged in towing, the victim was not guilty

Even if the victim appealed before the members and reads out the judgment of the H association court that has not yet become final and conclusive, this constitutes a legitimate act (misunderstanding of legal principles). Nevertheless, the court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles and thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. Determination

A. Determination as to the assertion of facts is that interference with the worship prescribed in Article 158 of the Criminal Act is a legal interest to protect the peace and religion appraisal of the general public. Thus, it is established even in the case of interference with the preparation stage of worship or in an indivisible relationship between worship and worship (see Supreme Court Decision 2007Do5296, Feb. 1, 2008). 2) The following circumstances acknowledged by the court below and the evidence duly adopted and examined by the trial court and the trial court, i.e.,: ① the day of the church of this case was sent “(38) No. 15000, 27000, 27000, 27000, 30000, 20000, 20000, 30000,0000,0000,0000,000,0000,000,000,000,000 won.