logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2016.07.06 2016고정36
출판물에의한명예훼손
Text

The sentence of punishment against the Defendants shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants are members of the Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical Ethical EthicalE as a pastor.

On February 6, 2014, the Defendants opened a nation of the Korean Union E Union trial with F, G, H, and I, and decided to dismiss, remove, and withdraw public funds for the reason that the injured party J embezzled public funds. On February 17, 2014, the injured party appealed to the general meeting of the KCA on the above dismissal, etc. at the general meeting of the KCA on September 22, 2014, which recognized the composition of the trial state and the illegality of the judgment, and ruled to restore the state to its original state.

Defendants, in collusion with F, G, H, and I, shall be punished by the dismissal, expulsion, and withdrawal of the Defendants from office of the judgment, in a weekly newspaper issued at the model reading company under the General Assembly of the Korea Coast Guard Association on February 12, 2014 with the aim of slandering the victims.

The reason is that the defendant J is recognized to be subject to the authority of the union because it fails to comply with the summons of the union trial.

It is recognized that the suspension (6 months) should not be opened even if it is due to suspension (6 months).

Illegally, the behavior of establishing a church is recognized.

It is also recognized that it is difficult to disturb the order of the church, and that it embezzled the public funds of the church by neglecting and not implementing the resolution of the church council, and by arbitrarily neglecting the order of the church.

This Court rendered a judgment that "the State declares the dismissal, expulsion, and expulsion to JC by its own name and ex officio" (Article 16 of the 16th Session), thereby impairing the honor of the victim by means of publications.

Summary of Evidence

1. Witness before J;

1. The suspect examination protocol against the Defendants preparing the examination; and

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to copies of the original examination, and those of the national report of trial;

1. Article 309 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 309 of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and selection of fines;

1. 50,000 won for each fine to be suspended;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) shall be confined in a workhouse;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Pronouncement [the extent to which the Defendants were appointed as a judge] of the Criminal Code provides for the composition, etc. of a trial court.

arrow