Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, from the date of the final judgment of this case, each of the above two years against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. From November 16, 2016 to around 00:30 on the same day, the Defendants interfered with the victim’s main business operations, such as: (a) in Erabbbb, in Erab, run by the victim C; (b) in F; and (c) in a high-quality manner, customers, who drink alcohol at the same place, are frightencing to drinking; and (c) making customers, who drink alcohol, take drinking at the same time, f.h., f.; and (d) obstructing the victim’s main business operations.

As a result, the Defendants conspired with F and thereby interfered with the business by force.

2. 공무집행 방해 피고인 A는 위와 같은 일시 및 장소에서 112 신고를 받고 출동한 남양주 경찰서 소속 경찰관들에게 다짜고짜 “ 야 이 씨 발 놈들 아. ”라고 욕설을 하고, 사건 경위에 대해 조사하는 피해자 경위 G의 몸을 밀치고 발로 그의 다리를 2회 걷어차고, 피해자 순경 H의 오른쪽 다리를 1회 발로 찼다.

Accordingly, the defect that the above H attempted to arrest Defendant A as the current offender, Defendant B assaulted Defendant B’s right head at the rear side of H one time in his hand, and the victim h’s body to restrain it was tightly pushed down with two descendants, and the victim h’s face was pushed down.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by the police officers on the handling of 112 reported cases and criminal investigations.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement concerning F in each protocol concerning the suspect examination of the police officer;

1. Statement in each police statement with regard to I and H;

1. Written statements of C and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each description and image of the scene of damage, photograph of the victimized police officer [the first interrogation protocol (No. 12 list of evidence) of the police officer against Defendant A does not exist between the above defendant and his/her name and seal or signature, and thus inadmissible (Article 244(3) of the Criminal Procedure Act];

1. The Defendants of the pertinent legal provision regarding criminal facts: Articles 314(1) and 30 (a) of the Criminal Act; Articles 136(1) and 30 (a) of the Criminal Act; and Articles 136(1) and 30 (a) of the Criminal Act.