The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

The facts charged in the instant case [criminal records] In addition to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective, deadly weapons, etc.) at the District Court on October 11, 2012, the criminal records of the same kind of crime are more than 12 times, and the criminal records of the victim C (n, 72 years of age) are more than 12 times.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On November 23, 2015, the Defendant: (a) expressed her desire to take care of the victim; (b) the Defendant expressed her desire to “Is the victim to take care of the victim; (c) Is the victim “Is the victim to be his/her superior; (d) I am the Defendant at the time of his/her escape; and (e) Is the victim am the Defendant at the time of his/her escape; and (e) Is the victim am the Defendant at the time of his/her escape; and (e) Is the victim am the Defendant at the time of his/her escape and walk the Defendant at the time of his/her escape; and (e) Is the victim’s intimidation, “Is the day of his/her bitch, bitch, bit bit

2. On February 25, 2016, at around 15:00 on February 25, 2016, the Defendant used the victim’s blue blue blue to the victim’s face without any reason, and used the victim’s blue blue to the victim’s face without any reason.

Judgment

The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Articles 283(2) and (1) and 260(2) and (1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Articles 283(3) and 260(3) of the same Act. According to the statement in the written application for non-prosecution of punishment filed in the trial records, the victim can be recognized as having withdrawn his/her wish to punish the defendant on October 13, 2016, which is the date the instant prosecution was instituted. Thus, the prosecution in the instant case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.