logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2014.11.26 2014고단881
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of 8 months, Defendant B’s imprisonment of 4 months, Defendant C’s fine of 300,000 won, and Defendant D’s fine of 50.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who operates a game room under the trade name of "H in the building located in the Gu and Si of the United States," and Defendant C and Defendant D are employees of the above game room, and Defendant B is an unspecified number of customers who find the above game room in the vicinity of the above game room and exchange points keeping certificates.

1. No person who commits any speculative act by using game products or who leaves another person to do so;

그럼에도 피고인은 2013. 10. 28.경부터 2013. 12. 3. 18:30경까지 위 게임장을 운영하면서 성명불상자로부터 구입한 ‘금각사’ 게임기 30대, ‘퍼펙트 포커’ 게임기 20대를 설치한 후, 위 게임장을 찾은 불특정 다수의 손님들이 게임자동진행장치(속칭 ‘똑딱이’)를 사용하여 게임을 하면서 정해진 족보에 따라 얻게 되는 점수를 그곳 종업원들이 점수보관증으로 작성해 주면, 손님들은 게임장 내에서 대기하고 있는 환전상 B를 통해 그 점수에 따라 점수 10,000점당 수수료 10%를 공제한 9,000원에 환전하거나, 종업원인 C, D가 손님들이 다시 게임을 할 수 있도록 점수 10,000점당 현금 10,000원을 게임기에 투입시켜 주도록 하여 사행행위를 하게 하였다.

2. On the condition that the Defendant receives KRW 70,00 per day from around 16:0 to 18:30 of December 3, 2013 from the above game room, the Defendant stated in the indictment “to assist the said A in performing exchange activities” in order to assist the said A’s speculative act. However, as seen below, as seen in the “judgment on the assertion of Defendant C, D, and defense counsel,” the Defendant cannot be deemed to have participated in the exchange, but the fact of aiding and abetting the speculative act can be acknowledged. As such, there is no concern that the Defendant’s exercise of the right to defense might cause substantial disadvantages, and thus, it is recognized as stated in the written indictment without any changes of indictment.

arrow