logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.01.08 2015나2031603
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, and this case is cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance is the same as that of the judgment, except for partial revision as follows.

6 pages 3 of the judgment of the first instance court shall be amended " May 25, 2005" to " May 24, 2005."

On June 11, 2015, the Supreme Court decided that the defendant's appeal was dismissed on June 11, 2015 (2015du39569).

Part 6 pages 9 and 10 of the first instance court's decision "Evidences 1 through 9, 5 through 12 (including each number)," shall be amended to "Evidences 1 through 7, 9, 1 through 5, 7 through 12 (including the number of pages)".

The 9th sentence at the bottom of the 10th judgment of the first instance court shall be amended to " May 27, 2012".

The 11th 4th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th

Section B from March 1, 2014 to March 1, 2013 of the 14th judgment of the first instance court, “B” is amended respectively to “B from March 1, 2013 to “B from July 12, 2012”, and “B from July 22, 2012.”

The 15th sentence of the first instance court shall be amended to "request for submission" of the 15th sentence.

The first instance court's 16th judgment "the date of the establishment of a tort" shall be "the plaintiff seeks as a result of the illegal act", "10.193.343 won" in the second sentence of the same 2nd sentence shall be "10,193,343 won", and " September 1, 2014" in the same 6th sentence shall be amended to " August 1, 2014".

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claims are dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow